Skip to main content

Is goodness a fashion? Pt II: Case study: Apple

Last time, I wrote an entry about the changing face of the world of advertising.
Recap:  Through the internet, we, for the first time have the opportunity to do thorough research into the products and companies we buy our goods from. This is leading to a much more critical consumer and a change in the marketing approach of those companies.

And I promised you more.

So, marketing is driven by the consumer nowadays, not by the product. How does this work?

We are at freedom to express our opinions in a worldwide forum for the first time, and for the first time, the voice of the consumer has the chance to be heard. This leads to dialogue between the consuming parties, which the selling entity, be it the shop you bought it in, or the company that produced the product, can follow.

A classic example of this is Apple Inc. (Formerly computers). Before the internet went truly global, with one billion users online and surfing, the companies reputation spread mostly though word- of- mouth, users' reports to their friends and relation and online forums and blogs,up until a couple of years ago considered very geeky. Thus. Apple acquired a slowly- growing user base, all of them highly satisfied with the product and the possibilities offered by the web for interaction with other users and the company. However, due to the limited scope of the web, very few people got to hear about the good reviews that the companies products garnered.

The release of the iPod in 2001 did a lot for Apple, of course, after those early adopters and tech geeks helped spread the word. Carefully targeted advertising and product placement helped rocket the iPod to fame. This was classic advertising, in the sense that the company advertised its product, and people shopping around for a new digital music player were made aware of this very simple way of interacting with their music and playing it easily. This did not really help it sell its core competence, the computer and software business

When Apple announced the switch to Intel processors, the established Apple users were at first horrified that apple was going to leave its track record of excellence, quirkiness and good design behind and go into mass production. If you read the forums and blogs, a heated discussion had erupted about where all this was going to lead to, wether Apple would become just another computer manufacturer, if the platform would become less secure and a myriad of other questions.

I began selling Apple computers around that time (bias warning!). For the first time, people who would never have considered a Mac as their computer showed an interest in this strange and alien computer. When they dropped the bomb, that you would be able to WINDOWS on Macs, the established community cried treason, at first. Personally, I found great satisfaction in seeing Windows reduced to what it had been under DOS: a program, running under an operating system.

Then, at Macworld 2006, Steve Jobs (Apples' CEO) dropped the bomb: the iPhone. This product, without Apple printing a single Ad, garnered what amounted to half a billion dollars in advertising. This was achieved through previews, reviews, rumors and, first and foremost discussion. Since that time, the interest in Apples products has literally skyrocketed. Selling Macs I found myself confronted with an onslaught of customers who did not fit in the established user scheme of graphic designers, lifestyle icons and technology enthusiasts. Apple managed to reach the common user through the hype around the iPhone.

And still, there are very few ads for Apple computers around. The only computer product currently advertised is the Macbook Air. Yet, every day, more and more people are queueing up to buy Apples latest kit. And most of them know what they want, and they have a good idea of why they want it.

This does not work through classic advertising. This is the result of people talking, discussing what they have bought and relating their experiences to others. In other words, the users for Apples computers, are their best advertisement. They always have been. But with them being able to email their friends and relations, text them, blog about it, post an unpacking ceremony (the first joy of owning an Apple is the box it comes in), then relate to their peers how easy it is to use and how nicely they have it all working now that they have gotten used to the different interface.

So, even if Apple does spend quite a bit of money (but not that much, compared to other companies), on advertising, most of their message is spread through trustworthy and familiar channels, who are much more likely to reach the target audience than a TV ad. The company and its products discussed openly and thoroughly, as are its policies.

Three examples:

1.) iPhone– one of the aspects of the iPhone that received 
thorough criticism was its lack of support for third-party applications. 
Apple is currently in the process of launching a software development 
kit for the iPhone, which will enable software companies to produce 
just that: Applications that run on the phone that are not by Apple, 
even if Apple will retain a certain degree of control over them.
2.) The environment– Greenpeace ranked Apple ten out of ten in it's 
policy towards the environment. This ushered in the new iMac, which 
stresses recyclabilty through. he use of aluminum and glass in stead of 
plastics. Also, in the macbook air, several hazardous chemical 
compounds were removed from the makeup of the computer.
3.) Transparent menu bars – users did not like the transparent 
menu bar in Apples operating system. In the latest update, they have 
been given the option to turn that off.

Of course, some concerns remain unaddressed. But this entry is not a rant about Apple in general, rather the focus is on the users dialogue with each other and in general, and how it affects the decisions of a company. 

Apple is aware that its public perception is its most valuable asset and encourages this dialogue, as long as it does not reveal its product strategy, or its internal workings. 
It is a question of time how long this can remain so…

They have been marketing themselves in this fashion for quite a while now, and when they do advertise directly, it is generally intelligent, unemotional and above all honest advertising that generates more discussion. See the Mac vs. PC ads, for instance (title link). 
In fact, those ads have been run through the internet, disseminated by fans, marveled at by advertisers, spoofed, discussed, analyzed and have been generally very successful. 

Like they say: It just works.

And it is a model that other companies might consider following. Apple has proven that it works throughout the last 25 years, and it is still working for them now that it has become fashionable.

To contrast this, here is how advertising worked in the past:

©Apple Inc.

Very emotional, laden with meaning, yet it does not say a single thing about the advertised product, except that it will smash all conventions. This ad, incidentally, was also voted the best ad of all times. More on it here, as the history is pretty interesting, and shows, that even then, Apples advertising focused mainly on generating discussion.

To be continued.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

IGAF: Utopia- Les Jours Meilleurs

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote this post, titled Dystopia , containing a dark version of the future, a look at the negative outcomes that might crawl out of the COVID-19 crisis. It has, by now been described as "9/11 in slow motion". Someone else broke a golden editorial rule to describe it as "2008  on crack". Media outlets, including Youtube, have warned of the long-term effects of this, on civil rights, labour and employment, surveillance and press freedom. And some, most notably Mr Orban of Hungary, have used this excellent opportunity to pass new, restrictive legislation that concentrates power in their hands. There have been calls for the elusive COVID cure not to be patented. And yet… And yet… It's easy to lose yourself in a media bubble, following the news and media 24/7, following, queuing in line to get into expensive shops, just walking into discount stores and the constant desire for many drinks (preferably with 10 friends or more, in a park

In Taheyya we Trust - How an Egyptian bellydancer found her posthumous stage in Berlin

“You should have winked at her,” Aida said dismissively, as if such a possibility had been imaginable for someone as timid as I was. Tahia Carioca was the most stunning and long-lived of the Arab world’s Eastern dancers (belly-dancers, as they are called today). Edward Said, Farewell to Taheyya My story with Taheyya begins in the summer of 2016, at Bulbuls Café in Görlitzer Str. in Berlin.  It ends two blocks down on Wiener Str 17.  Bulbuls is a café and art space around my corner that I have grown to like to sit in and drink smoothies (1). He had commissiond us- a crew of Syrian and Egyptian artists, as well as myself, to paint the walls inside the café. El Tenneen (the Dragon) is the one who ended up drawing Sheikh Imam, with the help of Salam Alhassan (known as Salahef/ Turtles) and Sulafa Hijazis (whom we call El Hayya/The Snake’s) beamers’ illumination. The Sheikh sits happily in the place to this day and Crew El-Zoo was born. Tenneen had the adv

Random Browsing gets me a new face.

Two o'clock in the morning is generally a good time to randomly surf the web and the blogs. This lovely lady, known to me only as Wow Legs, points the blogophere in general to this brilliant Manga face creator . Akin to the Simpsonize me Viral effort, this allows you to create a mangaesque face for yourself, using prefab elements that actually work. Hours of fun to be had here. I think this might be how some tv cartoons are made, right down to the script, except that they don't possess the power of a handsome jawline. Just to clarify: This is Wow Legs manga avatar. Generally, I try not to mangafy people I haven't seen in real life. The picture above is something I threw together as a test. UPDATE: I don't know what happened here, but my clarification seems to have caused more damage than good. As my editorial standards prevent me from knowingly misinforming you, I posted the clarification (above) to do exactly that and not mislead the reader. I also wanted to preserve